Site-verified retail vendor with 10 peptide catalogue signals detected in current evidence. Direct site signals: cart flow observed; COA mention observed; COA page observed; 2 OCR-derived COA images observed; OCR-derived COA details observed; COA inventory still incomplete in current pass; 0/2 inventoried assets processed; 0 priced peptide offers observed; coverage 0/83 (low confidence); regional peer coverage still thin.
Data last updated
Anecdotal signals
Testing coverage
We hold lab certificates for this vendor, but none of them correspond to a product currently in their catalogue — so we cannot confirm what is in any vial you could actually buy. Testing scores zero until that mapping exists. This one is on us as much as them.
Price
regional price-per-mg comparisons · prices checked 2mo ago
We don't issue verdicts — we publish the evidence and let it speak. Our automated site audit has verified the vendor's published catalogue and COA surface. So far we have captured no substantiated community reports and no lab documents for Proper PEP. That absence is itself information: it does not prove anything is wrong, but it means independent evidence is thin — proceed accordingly.
26 catalogue peptides known; no COAs captured yet. We hold 2 older lab documents, but none captured within the last 12 months.